| |
And so we have two kinds of “seriousness.”
In alphabetic seriousness, we concentrate on looking through
the notational system to the abstract reasoning beneath it. We build a
monopolistic attention economy. In pattern-poetry seriousness, we accept
a bi-stable seriousness which allows us to toggle from word to image,
from at to through and back again. Digital expression,
the familiar computer screen, creates, and assumes, a bi-stable seriousness.
Perhaps that is why it often seems, to all of us print-readers, distinctly
unsettling.
Under the influence of digital graphics, the shape impulse
is now showing up all over the print landscape, and not only in ads but
in workaday prose as well. For example, here’s an advertisement
for an investment firm which appeared in The Economist.

Shrewd business persons, when they come to invest for themselves,
are often “all thumbs.” Busy with their business, they lurch
from crisis to crisis with their investments. Leave such decisions to
Paine Webber, skilled in such prestidigitation. They know that your investment
portfolio should be as unique to you as your fingerprints.
Here is another visual/textual pun, a celebrity magazine
“profile” from a magazine called Mondo 2000, but
printed as an actual facial profile.

The headline (sideline?) that talks about a “sentient
toaster” introduces a text presented in a similarly self-conscious
way, suddenly aware of what it is doing and representing it in a picture.
What does such an outburst of shaped prose tell us about
the current environment for text? Clearly, a new pattern of attention
is being elicited from the reader, the bi-stable attention which pattern
poetry has so long incarnated. Shaped prose deliberately cultivates a
competitive market economy in which words and images, and the different
worlds they represent, compete for our attention.
|